There are two types of parallel deadlocks. The kind that end in an error message, and the kind that are resolved by exchanges spilling buffers.
It used to be that both kinds would produce deadlock graphs. Microsoft even added some additional troubleshooting information specifically for them.
But apparently that had some overhead, and parallel deadlocks for exchange spills got pulled from the equation.
- FIX: Many xml_deadlock_report events are reported for one single intra-query deadlock occurrence in SQL Server 2016 and 2017
I checked back to SQL Server 2012 and 2014 on their respective latest service packs, and they both still capture deadlock graphs for exchange spills.
There have been some CUs since Sp3 for SQL Server 2014, but they don’t mention anything about this being backported in them.
Why Is This A Big Deal?
If you were digging into query performance issues, or if you were capturing deadlocks somehow, you used to be able to find queries with these problems pretty easily.
In the article that describes a fix for many deadlock reports, Microsoft offers up an alternative Extended Event session to capture queries that produce error 1205 (a deadlock), but I wasn’t able to get that to capture deadlocks that were resolved by exchange spills.
I don’t think they actually produce that error, which is also why they don’t produce a deadlock graph.
Why they did that when there is, quite not-figuratively, an event dedicated to capturing exchange spills, is beyond me.
For me personally, it was a bit of a curveball for sp_BlitzLock. The XML that got produced for exchange spill deadlocks has different characteristics from the ones that produce errors.
There’s a lot of stuff that isn’t documented, too.
Change It Back?
I’m assuming there was some technical challenge to producing a single deadlock graph for exchange spills, which is why it got pulled instead of fixed.
Normally I’d think about opening a UserVoice item, but it doesn’t seem like it’d go anywhere.
There’s enough good ideas on there now that haven’t seen any traction or attention.
Anyway, if you’re on a newer version of SQL Server, take note of the change if you’re troubleshooting this sort of thing.
Thanks for reading!
If this is the kind of SQL Server stuff you love learning about, you’ll love my training. I’m offering a 75% discount on to my blog readers if you click from here. I’m also available for consulting if you just don’t have time for that and need to solve performance problems quickly.